A Twitter feud erupted on Thursday between a Jewish writer and a senior editor at The New Republic, who refused to condemn Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas for praising the Nazi-supporting Grand Mufti of Jerusalem.
New Republic editor Jeet Heer published a piece on Wednesday that accused Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of “dangerous historical revisionism,” in connection with his recent comments about the Holocaust. Netanyahu was lambasted for saying that Grand Mufti Hajj Amin al-Husseini had persuaded Adolf Hitler to exterminate, rather than expel, the Jews of Europe.
On Thursday, novelist David Sachs took to Twitter to ask Heer when he would similarly criticize Abbas, who called the Mufti his “hero” in 2013.
“When do we get your thoughts on the safe and cute promotion of the Nazi-supporting Mufti as a hero by Abbas?” Sachs asked Heer, before adding, “You seem strangely determined to draw attention anywhere except Abbas’ promotion of the Nazi Mufti.”
Heer responded by citing a statement by Abbas that denounced the Holocaust, though the New Republic editor still refused to criticize Abbas’s glorification of al-Husseini. This rebuttal did not suffice for Sachs, who kept trying to get Heer to criticize Abbas.
Heer continued to defend himself on Twitter against Sachs’ accusations, but did not directly mention, or condemn, Abbas’ canonization of the Mufti. He told Sachs that his thoughts on the subject are the same as his mindset of those who promote the extremist Zionist organization, the Stern Gang, as “Israeli national heroes.”
At one point, he told Sachs he finds his question “baffling since Abbas is person with no power.”
After much back-and-forth with Heer, Sachs sarcastically tweeted that Abbas’ “Nazi-promotion” and the current Mufti’s call for the death of Jews, are “not worth mentioning.” Pressing Heer one last time, he wrote, “Is it really so hard to say ‘Abbas’ promotion of the Nazi Mufti is dangerous’? Would it have been irrelevant to yesterday’s frenzy?”