Yehuda pleads with Yosef to permit Binyamin to return to his father despite the serious accusation against him that he was seemingly guilty of grand theft and deserving to punished and imprisoned.

His justification for leniency is based on the inextricable relationship between father and son whose ‘soul is קשורה  ­̶  bound to his soul’.

This seems like a poor rationale to allow a criminal to go free simply because he is emotionally attached to his father.

The Baal HaTurim addresses this issue by first quoting a verse from Mishlei.

Foolishness, is קשורה  ­̶  bound, in a child’s heart.  (משלי כב טו)

This is the only other place in all of Torah, he asserts, where the word קשורה appears.

Yosef was pointing out that imprisoning Binyamin would not rehabilitate him, since it was youthful foolishness that compelled him. Afflicting him would merely anger him but never change the behavior. The only effective means of reforming Binyamin would be by his being in the proximity to a father he is bound to that could inspire him to identify his impulsiveness and work on improving.

Only a father who would accept his child for who he was, caring sincerely about all facets of the child’s life, not merely addressing errant behavior, could provoke the child to accept a parent’s direction without resentment.

A story is told about an orphaned girl who was enamored with a suitor and interested in pursuing marriage with him. There was though a detail that was questionable about his character, and she sought the council of her Rav. When she presented her case to him, the Rav’s heart went out to her and her desire for a future happy life but was concerned over the issue with the young man.

On the one hand he couldn’t say no, nor was he comfortable consenting to the shidduch.

The woman was distraught and bemoaned that he was her Rav and he must guide her. In his frustration, he decided to seek the advice of the great Sage and Gadol HaDor, Rav Shach, to present his dilemma and seek his wise counsel.

Rav Shach upon hearing the situation, asked him to send the girl to him.

When she arrived, the Gadol told her how he heard she was orphaned from her father and offered to her that he would like to serve as her father from now on, not simply to come to ask questions, but to share everything about her life. She should tell him about, the good things that were going on in her life as well the difficulties and struggles she faced. With a father one shares the good and the bad, as well as the mundane.

A calm overcame the fragile young lady, and they spoke for some time.

Lastly, she brought up the predicament of the shidduch, and Rav Shach encouraged her to pursue with some qualifications, and she without reservations adhered to his guidance.

The Rav was bewildered as to what differentiated his ability to guide her in contrast with Rav Shach’s approach and respectfully asked the Gadol to explain.

The Gadol clarified that when there is a father in the home, a child knows that he has only the interest of the child in his heart. There is no self-interest other than the benefit of the child. When a child senses that, the natural response is to trust, and easily abide by his suggestions. A Rav on the other hand, if he were to differ with her, she would have to agree but also feel it was her opinion that was overridden by the Rav, because she couldn’t discount it, and she would forever question and blame the Rav for any future problems in her life on his decision to derail it.

The commentaries point out that the verb used to describe the ‘youngster’s’ attachment to foolishness, קשורה, implying being ‘tied’, indicates that it is not an inherent flaw, but something that can be untied and undone.

If so, does that hold true in the exact word usage in describing the parent/child relationship that it, too, is not innate as well?

Perhaps the answer is that it implies that it needs constant reassertion and tightening.

Binyamin was a father of ten children at that juncture, yet the traumas of his past, the death of his mother in childbirth; the tragic disappearance of his beloved older brother; and the episode of his being a pawn in the hands of the viceroy, left him extremely vulnerable. It was the remarkable relationship he had with a father that constantly reiterated his love for his child that kept him buoyant and in total control of his impulses.

May we each ponder our roles and the benefits our children will reap from emulating the master parent, Yaakov Avinu.

באהבה,

צבי יהודה טייכמאן